Submit your Article

I remember when buying something new felt rare, almost sacred. My school bag was always pink, plastered with the cartoons I adored, and my stationery spilled colors across my desk, often the kind that dries out too quickly. My clothes were patterned, stripes, polka dots, florals, a quiet riot that made mornings feel brighter. Every object carried a story, a fragment of myself. They were companions, stitched into childhood, worn, polished, and used until their edges frayed with memory. Today, newness arrives differently. It drifts in like obligation, and the things we acquire rarely hold meaning for long.

For Nepali teenagers now, consumer culture weaves quietly through everyday life. It appears in uniform branded items, the ubiquity of fast fashion, and the never-ending cycle of upgraded electronics. Objects measure taste, belonging, and aspiration almost invisibly. But beneath this quiet rhythm lies a weightier truth. Self-worth and social approval are increasingly borrowed from things rather than earned through effort, creativity, or connection. What once held meaning through use or sentiment now exists mostly for perception and visibility.

The rhythm of consumption has shifted so subtly that it now dominates. Items that might have lasted years become outdated in weeks. What once inspired care is quickly replaced by the next trend, the next notification, the next fleeting pulse on a feed. Mass production floods the city with ephemeral whims and cheap imitations. Novelty no longer lingers. It flares briefly before being swallowed by the next must-have barely a heartbeat away.

The consequences of this constant churn are evident and worrying. Kathmandu valley’s streets layer with plastic wrappers, synthetic textiles, and discarded trinkets, a littered trace of desire. Landfills near Bhaktapur swell with abandoned items, while the Bagmati and Bishnumati rivers carry chemical dyes and microplastics threading through daily life like invisible currents. Local crafts, Dhaka weaving, handloom textiles, and small pottery studios strain under imported goods, centuries-old traditions teetering toward obsolescence. Every purchase connects Kathmandu to distant factories where labor is exploited and environmental safeguards are minimal. Consumption’s true cost is never measured in rupees alone. It is etched into land, air, rivers, and communities.

Mass consumerism is reshaping Nepal’s social and ecological landscape in subtle, alarming ways. Forests and raw materials are harvested without thought for renewal. Rivers carry traces of production, microplastics coursing like uninvited shadows. Even the air feels heavier, burdened by the invisible toll of ceaseless manufacture, transport, and disposal. What was once a slow rhythm of care has become a torrent, pulling both objects and people toward fleeting value.

The psychological impact is equally stark. Social media amplifies comparison, turning possessions into metrics and consumption into performance. Teens find themselves caught in a race. They are not merely trying to own, but to signal ownership, to broadcast relevance, to maintain an endless cycle of validation. Functional items and once-treasured possessions mutate into temporary measures of identity. The connections between acquisition and its social, environmental, and labor costs remain hidden, leaving a footprint that is deep, pervasive, and largely invisible.

Yet consumer culture is not rigid. Objects can foster creativity, connection, and reflection when approached with intention. Items can be shared, repurposed, or treated with care. Electronics can become instruments of learning instead of tools of comparison. Incremental, deliberate choices, though small, ripple outward, reshaping the rhythm of consumption. They show that mindfulness can reclaim value from a society trained to discard. Even subtle, everyday decisions carry weight, transforming consumption into something slower, more intentional, and more meaningful. Nepal’s urban landscape reflects both the weight of the problem and the potential for change. 

Streets crowded with imported goods testify to relentless consumption, yet the city also holds quiet resistance. People make choices that favor care over speed, thought over novelty. Alone, these gestures might seem insignificant, but collectively they reshape the rhythm of buying, valuing, and reusing. A culture of discard is not inevitable. Every intentional choice becomes a small act of rebellion, a pause in the relentless cycle. 

The lesson is simple yet profound. Trends fade, but consequences endure. Shoes carry us across crowded streets, makeup bears experiments in identity, backpacks hold our belongings, and phones archive our memories. Yet the earth carries the hidden weight of manufacture, transport, and disposal. The choices we make today, how we acquire, reuse, and assign value, will shape the rivers, streets, and air of Kathmandu and Lalitpur tomorrow.

When the shimmer of novelty fades, what endures is not the object but the life lived with it, the connections nurtured, and the culture preserved. Consumerism can be seductive, but it need not define us. Slowing down, choosing intentionally, and imagining a future beyond endless production may be the most transformative trend we adopt. The care we show for the environment, those around us, and the heritage we inherit, along with small, deliberate choices before the next must-have arrives, will shape the Nepal we leave behind. And in the quiet that follows every purchase, a question lingers. Are we defining ourselves through accumulation, or through the presence, care, and attention we bring to the world around us?

Soniva Vaidya 

Grade XII

The British School, Kathmandu

Kidzee preschools across Nepal held a nationwide Walkathon on Nov 22, promoting the theme “Walk for Play, Not Screens.” Preschoolers, parents, and teachers participated across Kathmandu and major cities including Chitwan, Biratnagar, Janakpur, and Birgunj, celebrating active childhood and family togetherness.

Just two days earlier, Kidzee Nepal announced former national cricket captain and CAN Secretary Paras Khadka as its new Brand Ambassador. He highlighted the value of real-world experiences over screen time.

Parents praised the initiative for encouraging children to be active and learn beyond classrooms. Filled with joy and community spirit, the Walkathon served as a reminder of the importance of outdoor play and meaningful family moments.

The school bell rang, the afternoon was a view,

My senior, then, would teach me something new.

He introduced the bat and the spin,

A world of table tennis would begin.

At lunch, we’d play, the plastic ball would fly,

He’d always win with a triumphant cry.

He’d beat me soundly, tease and playfully shove,

But every moment spoke of care and love.

He wasn't just a champion, skilled and fast,

He was the kind of friend you know would last.

My one true friend, who showed me how to be,

In studies, play, and what my future held for me.

You were the map I followed, bold and true,

And all my inspiration, senior, was you.

Ujain Shrestha

A-Levels

Islington College, Kamalpokhari

AI is the computer system to perform the tasks for human intelligence for learning, to problem solving and it also helps to make our decisions. It was invented  by Alan Turing. It was established in 1956. It was successful by having clear goals and preparing data. It was created to replicate human intelligence.  It also helps in student daily life: It provides learning experiences to improve our study and it also makes the students schedules and organises in the student notes. It solves all the difficult questions in a few seconds. It is used all over the world for solving difficult questions.

The problems facing all students’ lives with AI are: the students are using AI for the homework  and the students are not believing in themselves and not confident. They are also not performing well in the activities which are done in school. It also reduces the critical thinking by the students. In this world, I think that 90 percent of people use AI in daily life. If all the students only believe or trust in AI for difficult questions they never become successful in exams. 

AI may affect and cause the persons by the privacy risks, misuse of the privacy photo risks. The people misuse the AI by the  to create or alter videos, images, or audio recordings.  The AI can be at risk sometimes if the hater misuse the privacy photo or something so, we should not believe in AI. 

The solutions to use AI are that we should use the learning algorithm and not misuse AI. AI can also do data analysis to automate processes to improve decision making. We should use high quality training data. By the AI it should understand that the people are in a nice mood or not.

Ultimately, the conclusion of AI is that Alan Turing is the inventor of AI which is very beneficial in our human intelligence life because AI solves all the hard or difficult questions. We should use AI for a certain time. The people shouldn’t misuse the AI to alter photos and videos. For the better improvement in AI that can also do the data analysis to automate processes to improve decision making.  

Kavya Shrestha

Grade: VIII

Aarambha Sanskar Vidyalaya